Monday, June 28, 2010

Greens say to new PM "take some action on climate change!"

Thanks to the Greens, climate change action has been a big issue in the
media since the new PM took office. We have plenty of opportunity for
reinforcing Greens messages of real action, right now.


***
Greens slam Gillard on brown coal export deal (The Age)

"THE federal government has been accused of sending a bad signal on
climate change policy after one of its first acts was to back the first
major deal to export Victorian coal. Trade Minister Simon Crean was
jostled by a group of protesters as he attended the signing of an export
deal between Melbourne-based Environmental Clean Technologies and
Vietnamese company TinCom. From 2014, the Victorian company expects to
export 2 million tonnes of dried brown coal a year to burn in Vietnamese
power stations, eventually rising to 20 million tonnes a year. Mr Crean
said the government was committed to tackling climate change and meeting
growing energy demands by backing technological advances that reduced
emissions. ''People are entitled to protest, but I don't think the vast
bulk of the Australian people think that exporting coal is bad for the
Australian economy because they know the Australian economy is heavily
reliant on coal,'' he said." Greens climate change spokeswoman Christine
Milne said the federal government could not be serious about reducing
emissions if was willing to open up a ''massive polluting'' export
industry. Environment Victoria chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy said it
was a ''disastrous first action'' by the Gillard government.

You may wish to write a Letter to the Editor and post on your favorite


***
Greens warn of environmental disaster if coal seam gas approval proceeds
(Qld Greens)

"The Queensland government's approval of Queensland Gas Company's liquid
natural gas (LNG) project, which would see expansion of coal seam gas
mining in the Surat Basin, is an environmental disaster waiting to happen
said the Greens today. “The Queensland government is gambling with the
future of our groundwater and the future of our food production for the
short-term royalties from gas exports,” said Greens lead Senate candidate
for Queensland, environmental lawyer Larissa Waters. “Once again the
community and the environment come last, and the resource companies
continue to run this state. The state government's shortsightedness will
be the death knell for local farming and for our water supplies."

You may wish to write on this important issue for Queensland.


***
What Greens must tell PM (Sydney Morning Herald)

EXTRACT: "Never mind the bollocks, it's time for Labor and the Greens to
hoick sleeves and do a deal on climate change that will put a price on
carbon and drag the Australian economy into the future. What would that
deal look like? We don't know, because Labor spent all last year talking
to the opposition and industry, sliding down a slippery slope, trying to
please the worst polluters in the country, who had a vested in doing no
deal at all … or making it so brown it was unfit for purpose. Labor is
quick to blame the Greens for the failure of the ETS last year, but that's
unfair. The Greens were sidelined during the ETS negotiations, until
Malcolm Turnbull fell to Tony Abbott and the promise of bipartisanship
evaporated. Then, it was perfunctory talks over a compromise proposal for
a carbon price, fixed and increasing, in line with the interim scheme
proposed by the Garnaut climate change review. But the government let the
talks slide, and soon after abandoned their ETS altogether. The damage to
Rudd was irreparable. Climate is a wrecking-ball swinging through
Australian politics, with increasing weight and reach. The Prime Minister,
Julia Gillard, is right: there is no consensus on the issue … any more.
Tackling climate change isn't easy - but is it that hard? Beneath
discussion of targets and trajectories, carbon trading and pollution
permits, it's fairly obvious what needs doing. Waste a lot less energy.
Burn a lot less coal. Transition to renewables. Electrify transport. Stop
native forest logging. Test soil carbon. And get cracking, because the
climate is telling us to, and the sooner we get going, the better our
chance of a competitive edge in the new, decarbonised economy of the 21st
century. Gillard has said she will talk to everyone, including the Greens,
about putting a price on carbon. Good."


***
Green groups angry at coal export plan (SMH)

"Environment groups are angry at a deal by a coal company to export up to
20 million tonnes of brown coal a year from Victoria and say it's not a
good look for new Prime Minister Julia Gillard. Ms Gillard is resisting
pressure from green groups to take faster action on climate change and
says she is in no hurry to start emissions trading. Ms Gillard indicated
it would be business as usual on emissions trading under her watch,
because there was not a community consensus on the need for a price on
carbon. Ms O'Shannassy said if the project in the Latrobe Valley went
ahead, millions of tonnes of greenhouse pollution would be pumped into the
atmosphere each year. "This is precisely the wrong message for Australia
to be sending ahead of this weekend's G20 meeting where fossil fuel
subsidies are on the agenda," she said. The Greens candidate for the
Melbourne seat of retiring Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner said the
government's position on energy policy was "criminal". "We know that
burning and exporting coal to make energy is not sustainable and we know
that we have to rapidly transition away from coal and to renewable
energy," candidate Adam Bandt said. "To be signing deals to export and
mine more coal are the signs of a party that's living in the 20th century,
not in the 21st century. The science just says we can't do this anymore."
Mr Bandt said Australia should be leading the world in renewable energy
technology but was instead going backwards."


***
Greens target Rudd's seat with climate activist (QLD Greens)

"Greens refugee spokesperson Senator Sarah Hanson-Young and Queensland
lead Senate candidate Larissa Waters will launch the Greens' campaign for
Kevin Rudd’s seat this Saturday, with Griffith candidate Emma-Kate Rose.
"People of Griffith share the disappointment of many Queenslanders that
Kevin Rudd has failed to deliver a compassionate approach to refugees, and
has failed to deliver any real action on climate change. The polls are
reflecting this, with record support for the Greens, and today's poll by
WWF showing 70% of voters in Brisbane marginal seats want an emissions
trading scheme urgently,” said Greens lead Senate candidate and
environmental lawyer Larissa Waters."


***
Queensland voters angry at Kevin Rudd coup (Courier Mail)

"KEVIN Rudd's brutal dumping could backfire for the Labor Party in
Queensland - a crucial battleground in the coming federal election. An
exclusive national Galaxy Research poll has given new Prime Minister Julia
Gillard a conditional vote of confidence but reveals deep dissatisfaction
with how the coup was carried out. Galaxy principal David Briggs said the
results showed Labor risked polarising voters. "There's some misgivings in
the community. People think Rudd's been shafted," he said. The feeling is
particularly strong in Queensland, Mr Rudd's home state, where 78 per cent
of respondents say he was treated harshly and 71 per cent think he should
have been given the chance to lead Labor to the next election. "If this
sentiment was to breed resentment, this could be a problem for Labor with
so many marginals to defend in Queensland," Mr Briggs said."


***
Greens full of beans over election prospects as Labor giant disappears
(The Australian)

"GREENS candidate for Melbourne, Adam Bandt, is like Jack in the beanstalk
story. He has watched his magic seeds grow beyond anything he could have
dreamed in the fertile fields of inner Melbourne, but just as he was
girding himself to climb skyward, the gruff giant of sitting member
Lindsay Tanner is gone. Quietly spoken and bespectacled, Bandt, 38,
doesn't look like a giant-slayer but this industrial relations barrister
has form. In 2007, he whittled Tanner's winning margin to a precipitous
4.7 per cent. "Make history in Melbourne" is his slogan. Victory would be
that significant. If Bandt were to win, he would become the second Green
to bust into the House of Representatives after Michael Organ, who won the
NSW Illawarra seat of Cunningham from Labor at by-election in 2002 only to
lose it at the 2004 election. National polling in May bounced the Greens'
primary vote to the highest recorded. Tasmanian voters forced the ALP into
a coalition with the Greens, and national leader Bob Brown likens the
groundswell he's sensing wherever he goes to the birth of the ALP."


***
Greens blamed for emissions failure (The Age)

"THE Greens are to blame for the failure of the emissions trading scheme
to pass the Senate and the party showed a ''disturbing'' lack of
willingness to compromise, departing ACTU president Sharan Burrow has
said. Ms Burrow, who was elected secretary of the International Trade
Union Confederation over the weekend, worked closely with
environmentalists to push for a price on carbon." Her comments to The Age
came as some unions said they would provide financial support for the
Greens in the federal election, or would recommend their members vote for
them in the Senate. Greens Senate candidate for Victoria Richard Di Natale
said the Rudd government had refused to negotiate with the party and that
if Labor's scheme had passed it would have stopped long-term meaningful
action."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Ed

Regarding Sharan Burrow's comments on the Greens and the ETS - those who look a little deeper than the surface are not surprised that the Greens opposed AND attempted to make amendments on the ALP's ETS, as it could not deliver on the target we realistically must attain, the ALP would not negotiate. The Greens alternative (of a carbon tax of $23 per tonne to the 10 worst polluters) must now see the light of day, and it is good to see that Julia Gillard is not (yet) completely blind to reality.

Sincerely
Bundaberg Resident

Anonymous said...

Dear Editor (Courier Mail and Australian)

Prime Minister Gillard was presented with an immediate challenge to show leadership on climate change. The brown coal export deal has illuminated
the government's true colours - and they are not Green. The Prime Minister could have cancelled the deal and instructed her minister to focus on export deals for renewable energy technology, but she did not. Over the weekend the Prime Minister said she would look at a carbon tax but is procrastinating on taking any prompt action. How can we believe this
government is serious about climate change action when on one hand it has opened up a whole new massively polluting export industry and on the other hand is giving no commitment to a carbon tax? Its becoming very clear that the Greens were not to blame for the failed ETS, that's for sure.

Sincerely
Brisbane Resident

Anonymous said...

Dear Editor (Courier Mail and Australian)

How can the Coordinator-General approve the expansion of the gas fields in the Western Downs without knowing the impact on groundwater and farmland? Is this a very clear example of how pro-development, anti-environment and
anti-community Queensland's infrastructure laws are? The Queensland government is failing, yet again, to protect groundwater and good quality
farmland. It is therefore time the federal government stepped in to take responsibility for environmental issues across our country.

Sincerely
Queenslander

Anonymous said...

Voters may move away from Labor because of this
action - but they'll move towards the Greens because the Greens are offering a real alternative voice and have real policy plans to tackle the
important issue of climate change. This is the issue that got Labor elected in 07 and they have failed to make good on promises. The new PM is
already procrastinating. She needs to talk to the Greens now, take action, or she may never move into The Lodge at all.

Anonymous said...

Dear Editor (The Age)

In response to Sharan Burrow's comments on the Greens and the ETS. Its true, the Greens designed a tough ETS as part of its Safe Climate Bill. This was the ideal. But they also proposed a raft of amendments to the government’s CPRS, many of which the government could have accepted or
negotiated on if it had chosen to be constructive. After the CPRS was defeated twice, the Greens also proposed a compromise as originally set out by Professor Garnaut to put a simple carbon levy in place. In all three the Greens were ignored. So in fact the Greens have done alot of work and alot of lateral thinking on the issue. As we now know, it was actually the current Prime Minister who was integral in shelving the ETS, not the Greens.

Sincerely
Brisbane Resident