Thursday, June 24, 2010

The Greens aren't to blame for the failed ETS (it was bad policy) and the Wild Rivers Bill

"Why you shouldn't vote for The Greens" (Q&A Discussion Board)
A follow on from Monday night's Q&A with Sarah Hanson-Young, this
discussion board has some positive but largely negative views about the
Greens. It would be great if you could post a comment on here in support
of Greens messages and policies. Some points to consider:


- Sarah did not seem to be given adequate opportunity to answer the
question posed to her without the heckling of other panel members, which
was a bit un-sportsman like!

- Was this heckling part of an ongoing attempt by the government to blame
the Greens rather than take responsibility for its flawed and failed ETS?

- The reality is people in the community want real action against climate
change not "just something" (which is what both ALP and Liberal reps on
the panel were saying was good enough) and the Greens have been
championing a real carbon tax for a very long time.

Plus there's all the ETS points from the topic below.




***
A renewable reality: don't let politics get in the way (Drum)
"In April, the Rudd Government abandoned the severely flawed Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme, the centrepiece of its national climate policy
agenda. After two defeats in the Senate, and unwilling to risk a double
dissolution election on the issue, Labor backflipped and deferred its plan
to establish a domestic emissions-trading scheme to 2013. At a time when
decisive action is needed to avoid dangerous climate change our national
climate policy is at a standstill. Australia desperately needs a new
approach. We need a policy agenda that acknowledges the urgency of the
situation and accepts the requirement of evidence-based emissions cuts
identified by climate science. We need a circuit breaker to reinvigorate
the debate and spur action. Today at Parliament House in Canberra, Beyond
Zero Emissions will outline such an approach with the launch the Zero
Carbon Australia - Stationary Energy report—a detailed blueprint for
transitioning Australia's stationary energy sector to 100 per cent
renewable sources by 2020. The report, published in collaboration with the
University of Melbourne Energy Institute, is set to spark a debate about
Australia's energy present and future, and more broadly, what constitutes
credible climate policy."


You might wish to comment on this story. Some points:

- Australia is ready and does need a response to climate change
- The ETS failed because it was bad policy, it was not science based, and
would not have any real positive impact on the environment
- The Greens have long campaigned for an ETS or carbon tax that would put
a price on pollution
- If the government had consulted with the Greens in preparing their ETS
instead of stonewalling them, the outcome may have been very different for
the government, the environment, and all Australians.


***
Greens snub miners as commodity surge predicted (SMH)
"THE mining tycoon Andrew Forrest got no joy from the Greens yesterday
when he tried to persuade Bob Brown to reconsider his party's support for
the Rudd government's resources super-profits tax. Armed with an
assessment that said the tax would ruin the minerals industry, Mr Forrest,
the chief executive of Fortescue Metals Group, also addressed a meeting of
Coalition MPs and senators where he received a more sympathetic hearing.
Mr Forrest is one of the most vocal industry critics of the government's
proposed 40 per cent tax. On Monday he declared it ''officially dead''.
However, if the Rudd government wins the coming election and the Greens
hold the balance of power in the Senate, the planned tax would be
implemented in full. Senator Brown said Mr Forrest was surprised the
Greens had committed to supporting the tax without hearing all the
arguments first. The Greens support a 50 per cent super-profits tax and
want some of the proceeds of Labor's tax put into a sovereign wealth fund.
Senator Brown told Mr Forrest yesterday the Greens would support Labor's
proposal. "We explained that we are a social justice party as well as an
environmental party,'' he said. ''The country's wealth needs to be
shared.".



***
Greens lament national income management laws (Greens MPs)
"The Australian Greens have expressed their extreme disappointment that
legislation extending income quarantining across the Northern Territory
and the rest of Australia has been passed by the Senate. The Social
Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Welfare Reform and Reinstatement
of Racial Discrimination Act) Bill 2009 gives the Commonwealth the power
to extend income management measures across the country. Senator Rachel
Siewert, Greens spokesperson for Community Services says the expansion of
the income management will begin immediately in the Northern Territory,
with most Australians still unaware that the measures can be applied
nationally. “There is nothing in the legislation to prevent the laws being
rolled out across the nation," Senator Rachel Siewert said today. “A
change of Government, or a change of heart by this Government could see
compulsory income quarantining applied anywhere in the country at any
time,” said Senator Siewert. “The Minister’s claim that the introduction
of indiscriminate mandatory income management is ‘all about human dignity’
is nothing short of hypocrisy, a look at the on-the-ground impacts of the
policies on Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory show that this is
anything but the case. “There is no dignity in being subject to compulsory
income management and having control of your day to day finances
micromanaged by Centrelink,” Senator Siewert concluded.



***
Big swings against Kevin Rudd in key marginals (Australian)
"Labor losing more support in heartlands; Seats won in 2007 show swings to
Libs; Voters increasingly dissatisfied with Rudd. SUPPORT for Labor has
crashed so far in marginal seats in Queensland and western Sydney that the
government would lose an election now. In Labor-held seats where the
Greens' vote is low, support is dramatically shifting from sitting Labor
MPs to the Coalition, removing hopes of Labor surviving on preferences and
boosting Tony Abbott as the prospective prime minister. Julia Gillard is
the preferred Labor leader in Lindsay, although Mr Rudd is ahead as
preferred prime minister and Labor leader in the three marginal seats
polled in his home state of Queensland. According to a special Newspoll
survey of three marginal Labor-held seats in Queensland and two Labor-held
marginals in NSW, Labor could lose 10 Queensland seats held by margins of
less than 6 per cent and at least four or five seats in NSW. Senior Labor
MPs fear the dispute with the mining industry over the resources
super-profits tax, community concerns about asylum seekers and
disenchantment with Mr Rudd as Prime Minister mean the ALP will lose the
election. Yesterday, Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young indicated it would
be a mistake for the government to assume Greens preferences would flow to
Labor with the same generosity as at the last election, when 80 per cent
of Greens preferences went to Labor. She said some recent polling put the
ratio at 60:40. "Who (voters) put as their second preference, that's
totally up to them. And I wouldn't be surprised if the distribution
changes at this next poll."



***
The Wild Rivers Bill (Liberals Bill)
The Liberals bill on wild rivers was debated in the Senate last night. The
Bill states it seeks to protect the interests of Aboriginal traditional
owners in the management, development and use of native title land
situated in wild river areas. If you see/hear any discussion on this
issue, you may like to note the following points for any response.

- The Greens do not believe this bill will address broader issues with the
Native Title Act, Indigenous consultation and community development. The
Greens believe the Native Title Act should be strengthened so that
indigenous communities are consulted and their consent is required for law
changes which affect their land uses and rights.

- The Greens support the existing wild river declarations because most of
the traditional owners do as well.


***
Supervised injecting rooms (Stateline)
This is a YouTube video of a Stateline story on supervised injecting rooms
in Victoria. Its a difficult subject to think about and not an easy story
to watch. Its important though to remember that Greens policy on this
issue is harm minimisation and evidence-based action. The video is open
for comment if you choose.



***
McDonald runs for election (Noosa News)
"Our prime minister has assured us there will be no early election. Voting
time is next year and it is the elected government’s duty to fulfill their
term. Well, that’s his view – for now. Yet, last Friday’s full page
advertisment in Noosa News featuring opposition leader Tony Abbot and his
refugee/boat policy hints at his party’s take on an early election. A tad
closer to home, Sunshine Beach resident, Jim McDonald has signalled he’s
gearing up for a early election by running as the Green candidate in the
federal electorate of Wide Bay. “What impressed me reading through The
Green policies was a concern for the condition of all Australians and the
sustainability of how we live in this country. Mr McDonald said he decided
to stand for for election because he believed that individuals can make a
difference. “It’s what democracy is all about. That’s why I spent so much
of my life working for a fair go. I would also like to give something back
to the community.”


If this is your constituency, you may wish to write to the Editor of Noosa
News in support of Mr McDonald and Greens policies. noosa@scnews.com.au



2 comments:

Anonymous said...

(1)
>
> Dear Mr Rudd
>
> British Petroleum boasts that it has access to unlimited funds to restore
> the environment, yet the oil continues to spew into our oceans...
> unabated.
>
> I read with interest this article today-
> http://www.wilderness.org.au/articles/oil-spills-spells-disaster-for-our-natural-assets?utm_source=phplist&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=jun_10_wildnews
> - which names (yet again) Halliburton. This company was a leading "dealer"
> in arms to the Bush Administration, which gives clear implications in the
> mass murder of innocents.
>
> Halliburton are also involved in "Global Solutions", prisons and the
> building of detention centres as far as I am aware. I certainly hope that
> your Government distances itself from ALL of their operations. This
> company
> appears to be complicit in the failure of the rig in the Gulf of Mexico
> and
> also the sub standard filling of Government contracts.
>
> Locally, the Timor Sea oil spill demonstrates that the petroleum industry
> cannot adequately prevent, and then address, oil spills in time to prevent
> ecological disasters. It is my view that damage caused to the economic and
> ecological value of our natural assets is unacceptable.
>
> The Kimberley coast marine environment is internationally recognised as
> one
> of the last great unspoiled regions in the world. Currently, less than 1%
> is
> protected in marine sanctuaries.
>
> In the 1970s Australia said no to oil and gas mining on the Great Barrier
> Reef, yet even this area is not safe as the recent accident off the east
> coast involving the Chinese coal ship clearly demonstrates. Boom nets must
> be put into every port of call along the length of the Great Barrier Reef,
> in fact in every port of call. I would also strongly suggest that ONLY oil
> carrying ships with double hulls be allowed into shipping lanes and only
> when climatic conditions are stable enough for their safe passage. All
> international ships which carry oil (particularly those without double
> hulls) must have fully qualified staff who are experienced and
> knowledgeable
> on Australia specific conditions of safe passage.
>
> The Kimberley, too, is an extraordinary marine environment and deserves
> similar significant protection.
>
> I ask your Government to:
>
> 1. Dramatically scale back (with a short term goal of ending all business)
> dealings with Halliburton and all companies that utilise their services.
> It
> is clear that their products and services appear to be very sub standard.
>
> 2. Declare a moratorium on expansion of any ocean based oil extraction
> facilities and implement an independent enquiry into the safety of all
> existing extraction facilities.
>
> 3. Ensure that all of our ports have adequate and up to date disaster
> mitigation facilities (including adequate boom nets) and highly trained
> clean up teams for any future disasters which may occur.
>
> 4. Ensure that all Captains that enter our waters are held fully
> responsible
> and financially accountable for all damage done to the environment.
>
> Yours sincerely,

Anonymous said...

> Dear Mr Rudd,
>
> The time has come for those who profit from exploitation of the earth's
> precious and finite assets to face the real consequences for the
> destruction
> they have caused and to "pay the rent".
>
> In that light, I support your proposal for a super profits tax, however I
> believe it should replace company tax completely (which is easily evaded)
> and be implemented right across the board for any private company which
> extracts assets and takes a profit from Australia's national resources
> (and
> established infrastructures).
>
> Revenue received should be utilised to tackle the most urgent two issues
> of
> our generation, climate change and the depletion of oil reserves. This
> could
> be done by providing the people of Australia with solar & wind power (on
> every household) and dramatic and substantial improvements to public
> transport, particularly in rural regions. I understand that public
> transport
> is a state issue, however an injection of Federal Funding into this
> neglected area is sorely needed.
>
> As an example, many places in the Federal seats of Flynn and Hinkler have
> no
> access to public transport on weekends and connections between these seats
> is a very limited weekly service provided by a private company. A round
> trip
> from Gin Gin to Bundaberg for a pensioner is $18 and the waged round trip
> is
> $36. The distance is 52 kms.
>
> Private car ownership in this seat is a matter of absolute necessity due
> to
> the high cost and the limited access to public transport. To ad insult to
> injury, those without private cars are at an extreme disadvantage for
> employment opportunities.
>
> Obviously an improvement in public transport infrastructure would conserve
> oil, our precious natural resources and be beneficial for our communities
> (and the planet). It would also open greater employment opportunities for
> those without access to a private car.
>
> I am sure such injections of Federal Funding would gain your ALP Candidate
> votes in these seats.
>
> I would also like some feedback on the Greens Proposal for a Carbon Tax of
> $23 per tonne to Australia's worst 10 polluters. Please provide a reply to
> the email address provided
>
> Thank you for your time.
>